Resources, Whitepapers

Ground support design cycle: An approach to increase safety and efficiency

Ground support



Ground support is essential in an underground mine to ensure the safety of the workers and the mine. As the volume and depth of mining increase, the behaviour of the rock mass changes. Hence, there is a frequent need to adapt and re-design the systems and techniques used to support and control the rock mass.

This article provides an overview of the Epiroc approach to the ground support design cycle, an iterative cycle to design, implement and monitor tailor-made systems to increase safety and efficiency in challenging ground conditions, allowing mining operations more time to mine.

Rock mass behaviour

As the volume and depth of mining increase, the stresses induced within the surrounding rock increase. This, in turn, may result in geotechnical design challenges, as the rock near excavations can become unstable, posing a risk to the safety of miners and the operability of excavations. The behaviour of the rock is determined by the ratio of the field stress to the in-situ rock mass strength.

Field stresses are the highest directly in an excavation’s skin and reduce to virgin stress levels some distance within the rock wall. In deep-level mines, the high stress to strength ratio results in a fractured zone in excavations’ immediate rock wall perimeter. Therefore, it is imperative to have a good understanding of the expected behaviour of the rock mass when subjected to various loading conditions. The rock mass may consist of various rock types. Some hard rock types, such as granite, have high strength and fail in a brittle (violent) manner, resulting in near excavation rock bursts. Softer rock types, such as schist, have a lower strength, resulting in a deeper fractured zone and potentially large squeezing deformations. Each of these distinct rock behaviours requires different considerations when designing ground support.

Ground support requirements

The primary objective of ground support is to mobilise and conserve the inherent strength of the rock mass so that it becomes self-supporting. Various elements are used to create a support system, including rock reinforcement and surface support. Rock reinforcement refers to techniques such as rock bolts and cables. Surface support refers to techniques such as shotcrete, steel wire mesh and steel straps.

In recent years, a significant development in ground support has been the design and implementation of yielding rock bolts. The most common and reliable yielding mechanism is the steel bar’s deformation between two or more fixed anchor points. Yielding rock bolts are designed to control, rather than prevent, the movement of the rock mass during dynamic and longer-term displacement events as the energy and forces involved cannot be entirely prevented.

Cai, M., & Kaiser, K. (2018). Rockburst Support – Volume 1. Rockburst Phenomenon and Support Characteristics (Cover page). Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: MIRARCO – Mining Innovation, Laurentian University.

The illustration by Cai and Kaiser (2018) depicts two distinct rock mass behaviours. The rock wall on the right has experienced significant deformation. However, it is stable due to a well-functioning support system. The rock bolts control the rock mass deformation by yielding and reinforcing the broken rock mass. Critical to the success of the ground support is the interaction between the shotcrete, welded mesh and yielding rock bolts which function as a complete system to hold and retain the broken rock mass. The rock wall on the left has experienced limited deformation. The rock bolts, anchored into solid rock some distance into the rock wall, reinforce the fractured rock zone and hold it in place. The rock bolts and surface support interact to retain the rock wall.

Understanding the expected behaviour of a particular rock mass allows for the specification of the ground support system performance, according to three main parameters; 1) load capacity, 2) displacement capacity, and 3) energy absorption capacity. Other considerations for the selection of the best-suited ground support system includes; 1) rock bolt configuration and length, 2) expected life of excavations, 3) installation equipment, 4) installation techniques and efficiency, 5) installation quality and consistency and 6) operator training and skill.

Ground support installation techniques and equipment

The performance of ground support systems depends on the installation quality. Therefore, the techniques and equipment used to install ground support need careful consideration. Modern bolting rigs, such as the Epiroc Boltec, offer the ability to install various types of rock reinforcement and steel wire mesh, allowing flexibility to select the best-suited support system as ground conditions change.

The installation efficiency of ground support has a direct impact on mining cycle productivity. According to a study conducted in 2016 (S. Haugen), the ground support operations can comprise up to 57% of the mining cycle time. To fully optimise the ground support cycle, an all-inclusive approach is required that considers the installation equipment and techniques, rock reinforcement and surface support.

Laboratory testing

As the rock behaviour changes, the ground support loading conditions change. Different ground support systems perform differently under varying loading conditions. To get a better understanding of a particular system’s performance, laboratory tests are conducted using specialised test rigs. Laboratory testing provides a platform to perform tests with relative ease and frequency. The repeatability of testing and instrumentation quality that can be achieved makes them an invaluable part of the ground support design process, contributing to 1) quality assurance and quality control, 2) comparative test studies, 3) determining system performance parameters and 4) research and development. It is important to note that laboratory testing cannot fully simulate underground loading conditions and other factors influencing the ground support system behaviour. This, however, is not the purpose of laboratory tests. The Epiroc test facilities in Johannesburg, South Africa, allow for the in-depth investigation of rock bolt behaviour under various loading conditions; including, 1) dynamic, 2) tensile, 3) shear, and 4) combined tensile and shear.

Field trials and implementation

Field trials are an irreplaceable step in the implementation of any new ground support system. Field trials aim to verify the performance of the system in an area representative of the expected rock mass and loading conditions. Trials may include pull testing of individual rock bolts and monitoring the ground support response to changes over time. Trials also provide a unique opportunity to optimise the quality and efficiency of the installation based on operator experience and feedback. Implementing any new ground support system can be associated with many risks and therefore needs to be well managed. Training is essential, ensuring that all aspects related to the correct functioning and installation of the system are well understood.

Quality control

The importance of quality control and quality assurance processes cannot be overstated. Quality assurance starts at the factory. The raw material is received and tested according to specification before it is released. Destructive and non-destructive tests are routinely conducted on samples pulled directly off the production line during the manufacturing process. Quality control certificates are issued and saved for record-keeping and statistical analyses. Each rock bolt produced has full traceability back to the raw material batch from which it was manufactured. Audits are routinely conducted to ensure compliance with international manufacturing and management standards. Quality control is not just limited to the manufacturing facility. Regular quality checks during and after ground support installation are essential. Epiroc offers rock bolt systems with built-in indicators that provide visual confirmation of correct installation.


Monitoring is an essential step in the ground support design cycle. Following the excitement of a successful implementation of a new system, this step is easily overlooked. However, monitoring provides an opportunity to identify any changes in the behaviour of the rock mass and the ground support response. The development of digital solutions and communication technologies for application in mining is opening up exciting opportunities for implementing large scale real-time monitoring. Digital rock bolt deformation monitoring systems aim to provide a better understanding of the ground support response and allow early intervention should ground conditions change. The learnings gained from analysing monitoring data provide valuable input for optimising and re-designing ground support systems based on the rock mass behaviour.


This article provided a brief overview of the Epiroc approach to the ground support design cycle. The iterative process aims to increase the safety and efficiency of mining operations, providing innovative ground support solutions for the most challenging ground conditions, allowing mining operations more time to mine.


Reference List

Haugen, S. (2016). Ground support 2016. Rock support in a cut & fill mine – from the operational perspective of a mine manager. Luleå, Sweden.

Cai, M., & Kaiser, K. (2018). Rockburst Support – Volume 1. Rockburst Phenomenon and Support Characteristics (Cover page). Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: MIRARCO – Mining Innovation, Laurentian University.

Send this to a friend